autopkgtest regressions against libuv1.44.2

Bug #1987693 reported by Nick Rosbrook
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
nodejs (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

There are two autopkgtest regressions in 16.14.2+dfsg1-1ubuntu3 when compiled against libuv1.44.2:

```
not ok 2053 parallel/test-socket-write-after-fin-error
  ---
  duration_ms: 0.518
  severity: fail
  exitcode: 1
  stack: |-
    node:assert:399
        throw err;
        ^

    AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: The expression evaluated to a falsy value:

      assert(gotServerError)

        at process.<anonymous> (/tmp/autopkgtest.0qinFV/build.3Ks/src/test/parallel/test-socket-write-after-fin-error.js:52:5)
        at process.emit (node:events:538:35) {
      generatedMessage: true,
      code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
      actual: false,
      expected: true,
      operator: '=='
    }
  ...

not ok 2485 parallel/test-tls-streamwrap-buffersize
  ---
  duration_ms: 0.412
  severity: fail
  exitcode: 1
  stack: |-
    Mismatched <anonymous> function calls. Expected exactly 1, actual 0.
        at Proxy.mustCall (/tmp/autopkgtest.0qinFV/build.3Ks/src/test/common/index.js:343:10)
        at TLSSocket.<anonymous> (/tmp/autopkgtest.0qinFV/build.3Ks/src/test/parallel/test-tls-streamwrap-buffersize.js:63:35)
        at TLSSocket.<anonymous> (/tmp/autopkgtest.0qinFV/build.3Ks/src/test/common/index.js:385:15)
        at Object.onceWrapper (node:events:645:28)
        at TLSSocket.emit (node:events:526:28)
        at TLSSocket.onConnectSecure (node:_tls_wrap:1563:10)
        at TLSSocket.emit (node:events:526:28)
        at TLSSocket._finishInit (node:_tls_wrap:944:8)
        at TLSWrap.ssl.onhandshakedone (node:_tls_wrap:725:12)
  ...
```

There has been considerable upstream discussion about this[1], and there is a patch available for the test-tls-streamwrap-buffersize failure, but not the other.

[1] https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/42340

Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
tags: added: update-excuse
Revision history for this message
Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) wrote :

Now that nodejs 18.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu2 FTBFS is resolved in -proposed, it may be unnecessary to upload a new nodejs 16. The attached patch is present in the 18.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu2 upload.

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot (crichton) wrote :

The attachment "nodejs_16.14.2+dfsg1-1ubuntu4.debdiff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are member of the ~ubuntu-sponsors, unsubscribe the team.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by ~brian-murray, for any issue please contact him.]

tags: added: patch
Changed in nodejs (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.