Missing information in 40-policy_banks
Bug #1963796 reported by
damluk
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
amavisd-new (Ubuntu) |
Triaged
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
I have been looking at the difference between the Debian and Ubuntu source packages and noticed 40-policy_banks.
Said config file does not do anything on its own. The included @author_
I assume that the original Ubuntu package maintainer did not see the functional dependency to the policy_bank definitions in the example of the upstream amavisd-new-2.6.0 release notes.
I think there should be an additional explanation that these policybanks have to be created as well.
To post a comment you must log in.
Thanks for taking the time to file this bug and try to make Ubuntu better.
After taking a look at the mentioned file (debian/ etc/conf. d/20-policy_ banks in the source package), it seems that you are right, this config has no effect since there is no definition of `$policy_ bank{'WHITELIST '}`. In order to have something that would minimally work (not sure if this is the original expected behavior) we would need to add the following:
$policy_ bank{'WHITELIST '} = { spam_checks_ maps => [1], lovers_ maps => [1],
bypass_
spam_
};
This is the snippet provided by upstream in the release notes. I am not a amavisd-new expert but I agree with your assessment.
I am marking this bug as Triaged, setting the importance to Medium and subscribing ubuntu-server.