QEMU

systemd complains Failed to enqueue loopback interface start request: Operation not supported

Bug #1886811 reported by Ryutaroh Matsumoto on 2020-07-08

This bug affects 2 people

	Status	Importance	Assigned to
QEMU	Fix Released	Undecided	Laurent Vivier
qemu (Debian)	Fix Released	Unknown	debbugs #964289
qemu (Ubuntu)	Fix Released	Undecided	Unassigned
Focal	Won't Fix	Undecided	Unassigned

Bug Description

This symptom seems similar to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1823790

Host Linux: Debian 11 Bullseye (testing) on x84-64 architecture
qemu version: latest git of git commit hash eb2c66b10efd2b914b56b20ae90655914310c925
compiled with "./configure --static --disable-system"

Down stream bug report at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964289
Bug report (closed) to systemd: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/16359

systemd in armhf and armel (both little endian 32-bit) containers fail to start with
Failed to enqueue loopback interface start request: Operation not supported

How to reproduce on Debian (and probably Ubuntu):
mmdebstrap --components="main contrib non-free" --architectures=armhf --variant=important bullseye /var/lib/machines/armhf-bullseye
systemd-nspawn -D /var/lib/machines/armhf-bullseye -b

When "armhf" architecture is replaced with "mips" (32-bit big endian) or "ppc64"
(64-bit big endian), the container starts up fine.

The same symptom is also observed with "powerpc" (32-bit big endian) architecture.

Tags:

Revision history for this message

Laurent Vivier (laurent-vivier) wrote on 2020-07-08:

It would help to know which operation is not supported.

Could you get the coredump?
Is it possible to run the operation with "QEMU_STRACE" set in the environment?
Normally loop ioctls are supported.

But it seems the following ones are not implemented in QEMU: LOOP_SET_CAPACITY, LOOP_SET_DIRECT_IO, LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE.

tags:

added: linux-user

Revision history for this message

Laurent Vivier (laurent-vivier) wrote on 2020-07-08:

It seems systemd is trying to use RTM_SETLINK.

Could you try this patch:

diff --git a/linux-user/fd-trans.c b/linux-user/fd-trans.c
index c0687c52e62b..b09b5b7c13e0 100644
--- a/linux-user/fd-trans.c
+++ b/linux-user/fd-trans.c
@@ -1200,6 +1200,7 @@ static abi_long target_to_host_data_route(struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
         break;
     case RTM_NEWLINK:
     case RTM_DELLINK:
+ case RTM_SETLINK:
         if (nlh->nlmsg_len >= NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(*ifi))) {
             ifi = NLMSG_DATA(nlh);
             ifi->ifi_type = tswap16(ifi->ifi_type);

Revision history for this message

Ryutaroh Matsumoto (emojifreak) wrote on 2020-07-08:

> It seems systemd is trying to use RTM_SETLINK.
> Could you try this patch:

Yes, you are right!
With the patch, I am able to boot containers of
Debian Bullseye of armhf and armel architectures!!

Laurent Vivier (laurent-vivier) on 2020-07-09

Changed in qemu:
status:	New → In Progress
assignee:	nobody → Laurent Vivier (laurent-vivier)

Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2020-07-09

Changed in qemu (Debian):
status:	Unknown → Confirmed

Revision history for this message

Ryutaroh Matsumoto (emojifreak) wrote on 2020-07-15:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1887606

no longer affects:

qemu (Ubuntu)

Revision history for this message

Laurent Vivier (laurent-vivier) wrote on 2020-07-15:

Fixed here:

65b261a63a48 linux-user: add netlink RTM_SETLINK command
https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=65b261a63a48fbb3b11193361d4ea0c38a3c3dfd

Changed in qemu:
status:	In Progress → Fix Committed

Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2020-07-21

Changed in qemu (Debian):
status:	Confirmed → Fix Released

Revision history for this message

Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco) wrote on 2020-07-31:

qemu (1:5.0-5ubuntu3) groovy; urgency=medium

has the merge with this fix:

- linux-user-add-netlink-RTM_SETLINK-command.patch (Closes: #964289)

Changed in qemu (Ubuntu):
status:	New → Fix Released

Revision history for this message

Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote on 2020-08-12:

@Ryutaroh - could you test [1] if it gets you around this bug (1886811) and if bug 1890881 is present in focal as well?

[1]: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4197

Revision history for this message

Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote on 2020-08-19:

To fully work this also needs the fix for bug 1890881 as identified there.

Changed in qemu (Ubuntu Focal):
status:	New → Triaged

Revision history for this message

Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote on 2020-08-19:

SRU need the bug 1890881 fix to be really helpful, but the dependency chain of that is not SRUable.
See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1890881/comments/17

Users (of this valid but rare use case) can either use Groovy which will fix this or wait until Openstack Victoria will make it available for Focal via the Ubuntu Cloud Archive [1].

[1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/CloudArchive