ubuntu_seccomp test failed on 3.2.0-120.163 - virtual x86_64(aws)

Bug #1653039 reported by Po-Hsu Lin
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
linux (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Kernel: 3.2.0-120.163 - virtual

Fail items:
[ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock
[ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first
[ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock
[ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl
[ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock
[ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor
[ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock
[ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter
[ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock
[ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence
[ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock
[ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_not_under_filter

stderr:
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:535:global.ERRNO_capped:Expected -1 (4294967295) == read(0, ((void *)0), 0) (18446744073709547520)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:536:global.ERRNO_capped:Expected 4095 (4095) == (*__errno_location ()) (0)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1322:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 22 (22) == (*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1323:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject crazy op value!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1328:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 22 (22) == (*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1329:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject mode strict with flags!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1332:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 22 (22) == (*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1333:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject mode strict with uargs!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1338:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 22 (22) == (*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1339:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject crazy filter flags!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1342:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 14 (14) == (*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1343:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject NULL filter!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1347:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 0 (0) == (*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1349:global.seccomp_syscall:Kernel does not support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER: Function not implemented
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1367:global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1368:global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock:Could not install filter!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1373:global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock:Expected 22 (22) == (*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1374:global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock:Switched to mode strict!
global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock: Test terminated unexpectedly by signal 9
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1398:global.TSYNC_first:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1399:global.TSYNC_first:Could not install initial filter with TSYNC!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1550:TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1551:TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl:setting filter failed
TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl: Test terminated by assertion
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1586:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1587:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor:Kernel does not support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER!
TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor: Test terminated by assertion
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1658:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1659:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter:Could install filter on all threads!
TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter: Test terminated by assertion
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1685:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1686:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence:Kernel does not support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER!
TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence: Test terminated by assertion
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1741:TSYNC.two_siblings_not_under_filter:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1742:TSYNC.two_siblings_not_under_filter:Kernel does not support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER!

complete log: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23704140/

Revision history for this message
Steve Beattie (sbeattie) wrote :

This is not part of the qa-regression-testing tests. Moving over to the kernel. Thanks.

affects: qa-regression-testing → linux (Ubuntu)
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Missing required logs.

This bug is missing log files that will aid in diagnosing the problem. From a terminal window please run:

apport-collect 1653039

and then change the status of the bug to 'Confirmed'.

If, due to the nature of the issue you have encountered, you are unable to run this command, please add a comment stating that fact and change the bug status to 'Confirmed'.

This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the Ubuntu Kernel Team.

Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) wrote :

This issue still can be seen on 3.2.0-121.164 - virtual
and I don't have access to these cloud instances, mark this bug as confirmed.

Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.