[needs-packaging] amulet

Bug #1292247 reported by Marco Ceppi
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Ubuntu
Incomplete
Wishlist
Marco Ceppi

Bug Description

Amulet is a python testing framework for charms

Revision history for this message
Marco Ceppi (marcoceppi) wrote :

This is being built in ppa:juju/stable; non-backportpackage is in ppa:marcoceppi/sponsorships

Changed in ubuntu:
status: New → In Progress
assignee: nobody → Marco Ceppi (marcoceppi)
Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Thank you for your bug report, you subscribed ubuntu-sponsors but there is no file attached nor link to a package to review, could you provide some?
Note also that trusty is feature frozen, so if you want it added before release you are going to need an exception (see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess for details)

Changed in ubuntu:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: In Progress → Incomplete
John Kim (kotux)
tags: added: needs-packaging
summary: - Needs Packaging: amulet
+ [needs-packaging] amulet
Revision history for this message
Marco Ceppi (marcoceppi) wrote :

FFE granted as per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1292258; the package was uploaded to ppa:marcoceppi/sponsorships I'm not sure how exactly (or what exactly) you need for me to attach.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

A few small things:
 - please add a COPYING file to the original tarball
 - please add a long description to debian/control
 - usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/amulet/charms/sentry/hooks/start isn't executable
 - some scripts have usr/bin/python as interpreter in the shebang line, but still shipped to the python3 directory and no python (2) dependency in the package

I pushed a bunch of small changes to lp:~dholbach/+junk/amulet-1.4.0-packaging

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Could you address Daniel's comments so this can be uploaded?

Revision history for this message
Iain Lane (laney) wrote :

Same as the other bug. Reset the status once this is ready.

Revision history for this message
Dmitry Shachnev (mitya57) wrote :

As we have the final freeze today, this has to wait until next cycle. Please also try to get this package uploaded into Debian so that we can autosync it.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.